Within the business world , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the very notion of accountability . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of questionable workplace conduct that tarnishes personal and corporate reputations but calls into question the enterprise’s ethical framework .
Even amid the disturbing allegations , Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? What does this imply about Ventia’s dedication to ethical leadership? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ pattern of ethical violations started with breaches of internal policies , but it escalated from there. Instead, it snowballed into a crisis of integrity that has left the workforce disheartened and stakeholders unsettled .
Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly exploited the session for unethical personal gains. It’s reported he engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, engaged in activities inconsistent with workplace policies, a clear breach of Ventia’s professional conduct policies , all while his home website life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross violation of IT protocols . His reckless exploitation of company communication channels to engage in suggestive conversations —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — illustrates a blatant disregard for professionalism . Following these virtual misconduct, Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have had inappropriate relations with a subordinate during work hours , despite both parties being in relationships . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources violated every workplace standard but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .
How has this level of misconduct remained unchecked? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, stems from a culture of impunity in leadership . Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.
This lack of oversight sets a dangerous example : that rank and influence within the company can protect individuals from consequences . It erodes employee morale, demoralizes employees , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .
